On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Larry Rosenman <l...@lerctr.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:28:10AM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote:
>> > filesystem?
>> >
>> (CC'ing jhb@ and tychon@, who might have better insight)
>> If we can swing it, I think the best model here should have always
>> been that userboot uses the host's scripts but the guest's
>> loader.conf. The current model doesn't tolerate any mismatch between
>> host and guest and looks unsustainable.
> Yeah, I have a FreeBSD-10, and a HardendBSD-12 VM, and BOTH failed until
> I loaded the old /boot/userboot.so to my host.
> We really need to tolerate this condition, and NOT surprise the user.

Right. That's what we're trying to figure out here, the best route
forward to make this stuff reliably work.
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to