And more importantly a great thanks for ctm from all of us who depended on it for ages ;-)
-----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp Sent: 22 October 2018 21:59 To: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> Cc: Rodney W. Grimes <freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>; Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org>; FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; ctm-us...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system? -------- In message <CANCZdfrMfEZxjwZGQZA6qEbZOm=91gka8xwezwsus-+iteu...@mail.gmail.com> , Warner Losh writes: >> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ? >> >> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells, confirmed that is who >> I saw with ctm usage. > >Do we need it in base? Or can we make it a port? Absolutely make it a port! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
