You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL? I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same thing. I guess that patch never landed? 102°C - 49°C is the very reasonable 53°C.
Yeah, sigh, it never landed: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16855 Ok I'll go ahead and commit that too. Thanks, Conrad On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:38 PM Conrad Meyer <c...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bluestop.org> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > > > Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat > > > plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your > > > cooling solution? > > > > D'oh, of course it's -54 instead of +54 (For some reason I presumed a > > positive > > offset would be *subtracted*)! I have an all-in-one liquid thermaltake > > cooler installed, and under Windows it reports reaching 67C when running > > flat > > out, which doesn't seem bad. > > Yeah, 67C seems totally great at load. > > > > (The references I can find with a quick search suggest TR 29xx should > > > also be -27? rather than -54?C, but they may be mistaken. 183-54-27 > > > is still 102?C ? extremely hot!) > > > > That's why I thought 54 was more likely! My 2990WX has 4 units for 32 cores > > instead of 2 units and 16 cores for other models, so I guessed that perhaps > > I > > should double the 27 value other people had said should be used. > > Hm, the Linux folks still use -27 for the 2990WX as well as all of the > other threadripper models. I'm not sure what's right. I wish I had > access to the Ryzen 2 register docs, but I don't. > > Best, > Conrad _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
