> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <j...@berklix.com> wrote: > > > Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted, > > still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/ > > without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/ > > > > timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released. timed > > should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write > > a ports/ entry. Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage > > this & admonish irresponsible conduct. > > > > The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat, > > this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure. > > > > The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the > port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current. > So there's no need to do anything rash here. > > I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction.
Lets prevent this in the future and make it formal policy that if the solution to a removal from src is that a port be created the order must be port created and working, then src de-orbit. Agreeable? -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"