On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 12:57-0500, Michael Butler wrote:
> This member removal has other consequences. As follows ..
>
> --- lib/libprocstat__L ---
> Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libprocstat/smbfs.o
> --- libprocstat.o ---
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:29: error: no member named
> 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry'
> for (entryp = map->header.next;
> ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:24: error: no member named
> 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry'
> entryp = vmentry.next) {
> ~~~~~~~ ^
> 2 errors generated.
Now we seem to be missing the prototypes:
--- libprocstat.o ---
/usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vm_map_entry_first' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map);
^
/usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:15: error: incompatible
integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'vm_map_entry_t' (aka
'struct vm_map_entry *') from 'int' [-Werror,-Wint-conversion]
for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: error: implicit declaration of
function 'vm_map_entry_succ' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
entryp = vm_map_entry_succ(&vmentry)) {
^
/usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: note: did you mean
'vm_map_entry_first'?
/usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: note: 'vm_map_entry_first'
declared here
I'm at r355504.
--
Trond.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
