On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:28:39 +0000 Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:14:52AM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:06:07 +0000 > > Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:31:35PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 22:04:07 +0200 > > > > Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:56:30 +0000 > > > > > Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:47:56PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've just hit again something that I've hit (and probably others > > > > > > > too) > > > > > > > often. > > > > > > > If a change in base break some ports and it's snapshoted in the > > > > > > > txz > > > > > > > available at download.freebsd.org, you need to wait a week for > > > > > > > the next > > > > > > > tarball to be available. > > > > > > > Since poudriere uses the tarball when you setup a jail it means > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > the only solution you have is to recreate your jail by building > > > > > > > it, and > > > > > > > since building world nowdays is very expensive that delay your > > > > > > > work too > > > > > > > much. > > > > > > > Would it be possible to generate the tarballs every day instead > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > every week ? At least for tier-1 arches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's revisit this sometime next week after 11.4 is out. > > > > > > > > > > > > Glen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure, works for me. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ping ? > > > > > > > > > > I thought the artifacts from the jenkins builder for CI were sufficient. > > > > > > Glen > > > > > > > Yes and no, > > > > I can add something to poudriere for getting the tarballs from the CI > > artifacts but that won't be by default. > > > > To be honest, that would be the preferred route, since updating the > various *.txz distribution sets would break things like bootonly.iso, > mini-memstick.img, and so on. Why would it break things ? > In other words, we already have a system in place that generates these > archive files, so I personally see no need to disrupt the "official" > snapshot build process to appease a subset of the user base while > unnecessarily adding a pain point for the rest. > > Glen > If only the sets are generated each day I don't see how it can cause a pain to anyone. -- Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> <m...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
