Brooks Davis <brooks_at_freebsd.org> wrote on Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 02:03:09 UTC :
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:13AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:20:25PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > That's probably worth a shot. Static linking will work anyway because > > > libc.a in effect embeds libsys to retain compatability. > > Please do not add libsys.so to the ABI. Right now it is an implementation > > detail of libthr and libc, and it is preferable to not change it, at least > > not yet, and definitely not to solve some minor internal issues. > > Indeed, on further reflection I agree. Another option occured to me > which I intend to persue tomorrow: explicitly link the sanitizer .so > files with libsys. At least in the base system that should be straight > foward. Does the errno move to libsys have any problems similar to the __elf_aux_vector move to libsys --that might also lead to needing -lsys (for things as the are now)? For reference: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main/2024-February/022025.html === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
