On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 14:29] wrote:
> > 
> > I have a feeling that this is related to missing spl protection around
> > the chgsbsize subsystem, this was probably an issue before I touched it
> > but since I touched it last I'll have a look-see.
> > 
> > Brian, does that makes sense?
> [...]
> Does it make sense to wrap chgsbsize with spl so callers don't have
> to worry about it?

Yeah, I say to go for it.  I was /certain/ that these functions had
the right spl()s before; if the patch fixes jdp's problem, I can't see
a good reason not to change it, other than it would hide what may be
quite problematic for other reasons even if not for that one...

 Brian Fundakowski Feldman           \  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!  /
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    `------------------------------'

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to