On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:59:46PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > The only thing you don't like about mtree is it changing ownership +
> > modes, right?
>
> Not only that. Using mtree(1) creates busloads of unnecessary
> directories.
But they're harmless. While I agree it is clutter, having to duplicate
its work in the Makefile's with lists of dirs to create just seems like a
duplication and waste of effort; and even an little NIH as mtree is
rather ingrained in BSD.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... David O'Brien
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: using mtree in our build... David O'Brien
- Re: using mtree in our b... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Bruce Evans
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with gr... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues wit... Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Matt Dillon
- Re: Bootstrapping issues with groff(1) Marcel Moolenaar
