On 18 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since proc can be NULL and most of the other code in nfs_socket
> handles it I do think this actually is the right thing to do.
I'm more concerned with whether it's actually normal for the process
pointer to be NULL in the first place. Is this the case? And if so, why
is nfs_msg() being called with this pointer being passed in in the first
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message