In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nat Lanza writes:
>John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Releases are bad enough as is w/o having to add in a multitude of
>> hacks so that one can roll a 5.0 release on a 2.2.x box, etc.
>Sure, but allowing 4.x users to do a source upgrade to 5.0 makes the
>upgrade path much more flexible. There's a big difference between
>"support source upgrades from version N-1" and "support source
>upgrades from all versions".

You don't need "make release" to do a source upgrade from 4.x to 5.x...

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to