Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> : Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > I'd rather see this patch, or something similar, than bump the major
> : > version again.  We can phase in a better way to obviate the need to do
> : > this in the future.
> : 
> : Brian Feldman, Peter Wemm, David O'Brien and myself have been
> : discussing possible solutions on IRC for the past two hours. Peter
> : will likely commit a patch sometime soon.
> If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't
> require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api,
> then I'm all for that.  I'd love to test it out as well if there's any
> desire for that.

Do you really want to carry the baggage for the entire 5.0-RELEASE and
5-STABLE branch?  Just because of a pedantic policy point?

Personally, I think that sucks. :-(

"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to