On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 06:26:06PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > I don't see why we need only an increment of 1. What does this buy us > other than a minor warm fuzzy. It is hackish. > OpenBSD bumps libc bunchs of times per release cycle (they are up to > libc.so.24 if my sources are current). They do not always get things right... Actually going from libc.so.500 to libc.so.{x<500} is easy. Copy libc.so.500 into /usr/lib/compat. When the libc.so link is made to libc.so.{x<500}, that is the lib version number that will get burned into objects. After the first `make world', rm /usr/lib/libc.so.500. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Patch for FILE problems ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CUR... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems ... Matt Dillon
- Re: Patch for FILE problems ... Warner Losh
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: ... Peter Wemm
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... Jos Backus
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was... David O'Brien
- Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad f... Alex Zepeda