Will Andrews wrote:

> [  cc's trimmed, moved to -current  ]
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > So long as it is not forced unconditionally to be static.
> I agree.
> > b) I've not seen the numbers for this.  If it is only 1% faster, it
> > doesn't make sense, even though it sounds good on paper.
> I will perform careful benchmarks and publish results.  Can people wait
> until that is done before moving forward please?  Give me until Saturday.

Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with 92
installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have origin
recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that
statically-compiled make is about 15% faster than dynamically-compiled. Sound like a
reasonable speed gain for 100k binary size increase. What do people think?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to