On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 16:39:44 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> the way we code the standard utilities.  That doesn't mean we
> shouldn't implement <wctype.h> et al, but it does mean that we should
> use whichever facilities are cleanest, and easiest to code for and
> maintain, rather than those which are specifically blessed by an ISO
> working group.

In general wc*() functions provide more flexibility than runes, but in
case we discuss there is no difference.

Andrey A. Chernov

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to