On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 00:49:33 +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
> > Breaking nfs from working on user defined ports is a step backwards and
> > should be fixed.  Lots of people run nfsd and cfsd at the same time.
> No, you understand me wrong, the way this is done is bogus. If you set
> -DCFS_PORT=3049 like it is done at the moment and use nc instead of NULL
> it works. To have a NULL nc entry is not correct in tirpc.

So the question is: why cfsd attempts to register with NULL netconfig for
ports != 2049? What it wants to obtain by such move?

Andrey A. Chernov

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to