On Mon, 07 May 2001 09:55:44 MST, Matt Dillon wrote: > Theoretically the system is supposed to start killing large processes > when memory + swap gets full, but that code does not appear to be working > as well as it should at the moment. I think that's all that Dennis was questioning. All he needed was your answer. :-) > This argument rears its head about once a year and usually turns into a > huge flame war. I think DES was responding to that flame war, rather than to Dennis' actual question. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Matt Dillon
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dennis Glatting
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dennis Glatting
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dennis Glatting
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Terry Lambert
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Matt Dillon
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Sheldon Hearn
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dennis Glatting
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Szilveszter Adam
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Terry Lambert
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Dima Dorfman
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm John Baldwin
- Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm Robert Watson