On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:51:59AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > : FWIW, my gross hack to usr.sbin/kbdcontrol also worked:
> > 
> > I tend to dislike adding ../../sys to the includes list since they
> > might not be compatible with the host's sys files used to build libc.
> I'd like to remove all the existing ones.  They are a hack to handle
> the case where you haven't bootstrapped properly.  They intentionally
> give <sys> includes which may be incompatible with the host ones, in
> case the host ones are out of date relative to the src tree.  This
> depends on only a few headers like <sys/user.h> being out of date,
> and sometimes helps mainly for headers like <sys/user.h> which declare
> system structures that are groped in by userland.  But it is just a
> bug in general.
I've done the first step in that direction.  :-)

Ruslan Ermilov          Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]           Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251        Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to