* Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010525 22:22] wrote:
> Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if
> necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not?  At the moment, detaching
> an md(4) disk will panic the system with a failed mtx_assert in
> vm_pager_deallocate.  This can be fixed one of two ways:
> vm_pager_deallocate could be made to deal with vm_mtx itself like
> vm_pager_allocate does, or md(4) and any other drivers which call
> vm_pager_deallocate can be fixed to acquire vm_mtx.  So which will it
> be?  I'll supply patches for either case.

Usually fixing the caller is better as it will catch people that
expect vm state to remain unchanged across several calls.

-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to