On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:44:37PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > > I still don't see why an rc.conf knob specifically for /tmp isn't
> > > sufficient.  That's what people want this for.  Others can read the
> > > excellent documentation supplied in mdconfig(8), which is appropriately
> > > cross-referenced from md(4), which is the manual page for the device
> > > concerned.  Logical, orthogonal and pretty damn easy, when you look at
> > > the EXAMPLES section. :-)
> How about make a port of out the mount_mfs compatible program and
> committing your (Sheldon's) /tmp rc.conf patch?  Those who only need
> /tmp (and as you say, this is the majority) have what they need, we
> don't have [needless] stuff in the base system, and those who need
> something that pretends to be mount_mfs can get that from the ports.
> Does this sound good?

My vote would be to have the mount_mfs script/program in the base
system, even if it has nothing to do with mfs, as long as it do
what the old mount_mfs program did.


Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk  -  CCIE #5456
Work:    Network manager   @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)

One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to