In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Dowse writes: >iedowse 2001/05/29 13:45:09 PDT > > Modified files: > sbin/fsck_ffs setup.c > Log: > Ignore the new superblock fields fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes > when comparing with the alternate superblock. These fields are used > for temporary in-core information only. This should fix the "VALUES > IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST ALTERNATE" error from > fsck_ffs that has been seen a lot recently. Note that this will not fix the softupdates freelist corruption problem that people have been reporting. It seems that Kirk is away for at least another week, so if Tor's suggested fix for that works, then it should probably be committed in the meantime. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
