Bah, what a brilliant end to an already bad day. :-( I managed to commit a
patch that I changed last night, and when recompiling today before commit,
I used the wrong tree. I was in a rush to get home for my son's grade 1
class school musical.
Yes, it cannot possibly work. :-( Fixing it now.. Argh!
Richard Todd wrote:
> Just tried to build a kernel with freshly-supped sources and got:
> cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extens
ions -ansi -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../dev -I../../../include -I.
./../contrib/dev/acpica -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mpreferred-
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:88: syntax error before `&'
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:55: warning: `adopen' used but never defined
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:56: warning: `adstrategy' used but never defined
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:57: warning: `addump' used but never defined
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:58: warning: `ad_cdevsw' defined but not used
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:73: warning: `addisk_cdevsw' defined but not used
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:76: warning: `ad_invalidatequeue' declared `static'
but never defined
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:77: warning: `ad_tagsupported' declared `static' but
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:78: warning: `ad_timeout' declared `static' but neve
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:79: warning: `ad_free' declared `static' but never d
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:80: warning: `ad_version' declared `static' but neve
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:83: warning: `adp_lun_map' defined but not used
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:85: warning: `ata_dma' defined but not used
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:86: warning: `ata_wc' defined but not used
> ../../dev/ata/ata-disk.c:87: warning: `ata_tags' defined but not used
> *** Error code 1
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/ICHOTOLOTSMP.
> Line 88 is in the diffs that peter just recently committed (rev 1.106; see
> the commitlogs/sys entry for 2001/06/06 15:17:09 PDT). The offending line
> TUNABLE_INT("hw.ata.ata_dma", &ata_dma);
> Looking at the definition of TUNABLE_INT, it doesn't look like it'd take well
> to having the 2nd argument (var) be something beginning with &, given that th
> first thing the definition does is try to define a function based on the var
> given, in this case
> static void __Tunable_&ata_dma (void *ignored)
> See the problem?
Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message