The current suggestion is fine except that each platform might have a more
efficient, or even required, actual h/w mechanism for mapping mbufs.
I'd also be a little concerned with the way you're overloading stuff into mbuf
itself- but I'm a little shakier on this.
Finally- why not make this an inline?
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Bill Paul wrote:
> Okay, I decided today to write a bus_dmamap_load_mbuf() routine to
> make it a little easier to convert the PCI NIC drivers to use the
> busdma API. It's not the same as the NetBSD code. There are four
> new functions:
> This is more or less in keeping with the existing API, except the new
> routines work exclusively on mbuf lists. The thing I need to figure
> out now is where to put the code. The current suggestion from jhb is
> to create the following two new files:
> The functions are machine-independent, so they shouldn't be in
> sys/<arch>/<arch>/busdma_machdep.c. I mean, they could go there, but
> that would just result in code duplication. If somebody has a better
> suggestion, now's the time to speak up. Please let's avoid creating
> another bikeshed over this.
> Current code snapshot resides at:
> There's also a modified version if the Adaptec "starfire" driver there
> which uses the new routines. I'm running this version of the driver on
> a test box in the lab right now.
> -Bill Paul (510) 749-2329 | Senior Engineer, Master of Unix-Fu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Wind River Systems
> "I like zees guys. Zey are fonny guys. Just keel one of zem." -- The 3 Amigos
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message