On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > No, awk should be fixed instead to conform POSIX specs, or switched back
> > to gawk.
> It's not a binary decision.  What we should probably do is:
> 1) Disconnect bwk-awk from the build.
> 2) Connect gawk to the build.
> 3) Fix bwk-awk and / or in-tree scripts that rely on gawkisms.
> 4) Disconnect gawk from the build.
> 5) Connect bwk-awk to the build.
> 6) Issue a fat HEADS UP to -current (and probably -ports).

Mostly agreed.  This has not been at all as smooth as I thought it would
be.  Before going down this path, I would like to see if the current
state of the world isn't usable.  I think (hope) all the nits are out
now.   #6 is definately needed if Bell-Labs awk stays.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to