Probably, the reason is to still have a working KINFO_PROC_SIZE even
if the user modifies NGROUPS_MAX?

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:12:45AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX?
> None -- ideally, they would be the same.  I was reminding him that if he
> updated one, he should be sure to update the other.
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > 
> > > Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred.  Note also that this
> > > may have fascinating effects in NFS environments.  Note also that you'll
> > > probably want to update KI_NGROUPS also.  No idea if it will affect NIS. 

Ruslan Ermilov          Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]           Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251        Simferopol, Ukraine  The Power To Serve   Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to