"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What you dislike in that way? This method fully described in pam(8).
The fact that it is described in pam(8) does not mean we like it. We also have a man page for gets(3), but you know what BDE will say if you try to use it. > I see no differences using short forms like > > "sufficient" > > or its full long analog like > > "[default=ignore sucess=done new_authtok_reqd=done]" > > short forms are only aliases. No. The "[...]" form is a Linux-PAM invention, and is tightly linked to Linux-PAM implementation details. It does not exist in other PAM implementations. I aim to move *away* from dependence on Linux-PAM, not *towards* it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message