"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What you dislike in that way? This method fully described in pam(8).

The fact that it is described in pam(8) does not mean we like it.  We
also have a man page for gets(3), but you know what BDE will say if
you try to use it.

> I see no differences using short forms like
> "sufficient"
> or its full long analog like
> "[default=ignore sucess=done new_authtok_reqd=done]"
> short forms are only aliases.

No.  The "[...]" form is a Linux-PAM invention, and is tightly linked
to Linux-PAM implementation details.  It does not exist in other PAM
implementations.  I aim to move *away* from dependence on Linux-PAM,
not *towards* it.

Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to