> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 14:07:48 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Umm, you can't use opiechallenge() for that. You're not supposed to
> > > call opiechallenge() without also calling opieverify() (plus, I think
> > > opiechallenge() "consumes" a challenge). Use opielookup() instead.
> > Even better, opie_haskey() (which is a wrapper around opielookup()).
> > New patch attached.
> Yes, this patch works as expected, but I doubt about opie_haskey() status.
> It looks like non-standard FreeBSD addition since it is in the local
> opieextra.c file and not in contrib/opie. If you care about
> machine independance, better use opielookup() directly.
No, that is OK. :-)
The FreeBSD PAM modules are all written from scratch as BSD PAM modules.
o Mark Murray
\_ FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message