* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020223 14:43] wrote:
>     This is approximately what I am thinking.  Note that this gives us the
>     flexibility to create a larger infrastructure around the bucket cache,
>     such as implement per-cpu caches and so on and so forth.  What I have
>     here is the minimal implementation.

I strongly object to this implementation right now, please do not
commit it.  I already explained to you how to make the problem
go away but instead you insist on some complex api that pins
memory down like the damn zone allocator.  It's not needed, so
please don't do it.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to