On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 00:42, Michael Smith wrote:
> > But would an IrDA specific driver do anything differently than sio
> > would? SIR is effectively an 16550 UART from what I've seen so far.
> > Maybe I'm missing something?
> Well, except that it has no flow control, is only half-duplex, and you
> might want to attach an IrDa stack to the device.
> If all the IrDa stack work is being done in userland, then this probably
> makes sense. If not, then at the very least, sio(4) needs to behave
> differently in the case of a SIR port.
The only implementation of IrDA stack for FreeBSD I know
(not finished) uses netgraph interface of sio driver.
I am use Infra-red port to access my HP200LX via IR (no IrDA)
with lxtools package
And Linux use /dev/ttyS? to refer infra-red ports.
TSB "Russian Express", Moscow
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message