On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:47:29PM +0700, John Indra wrote:

> And to clarify things... I don't know what's wrong with malloc() in -CURRENT
> and -STABLE (and I don't even know whether it's even "wrong"). All I want is
> to let the Perl maintainer in -CURRENT and -STABLE to compile the stock Perl
> with its own malloc library, thus Perl in FreeBSD doesn't suffer from this
> kind of slowness.

phkmalloc is generally pretty efficient..how do you know that
switching to the perl internal malloc to optimize this particular
usage pattern won't severely pessimize others?


Attachment: msg36055/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to