On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:47:29PM +0700, John Indra wrote: > And to clarify things... I don't know what's wrong with malloc() in -CURRENT > and -STABLE (and I don't even know whether it's even "wrong"). All I want is > to let the Perl maintainer in -CURRENT and -STABLE to compile the stock Perl > with its own malloc library, thus Perl in FreeBSD doesn't suffer from this > kind of slowness.
phkmalloc is generally pretty efficient..how do you know that switching to the perl internal malloc to optimize this particular usage pattern won't severely pessimize others? Kris
Description: PGP signature