Michael Smith wrote:
> > What's the basis of the assumption that the I/O range is
> > unsupported in the first place, and why isn't it true for this
> > bridge chip, if it's a valid assumption for others?
> The information was provided in the debugging output and code that Alfred
> supplied in earlier messages. The short answer is "programmer error".
> You're walking into another conversation with insufficient context. 8)
Hey, I'll always sit still for someone willing to give me context...
I was thinking it would be easier to get enough info to Alfred,
and let the patch pop out there. 8-) 8-).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message