On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote: >> * XXX >> * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument >> * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use >> * both compilers.
>> Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD? > > This became invalid before FreeBSD-2.0 was released. > > Most special cases to support gcc's before approx 2.7 are now bogus. > Unlike the above, most of them are just for optimizations or for better > diagnostics, so removing them shouldn't break compiling with old versions > of gcc any more than not having the for other C compilers breaks compiling > with other C compilers. Thank you, I will remove them in my icc patches. Bye, Alexander. -- Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message