On 18 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Actually, the bug is in the PAM configuration files that list pam_unix
> as a "session" module while pam_unix doesn't provide session
> management services.  PAM is correct in whining about that.  The
> solution is to remove lines like this from /etc/pam.d/*:
> session         required        pam_unix.so

If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?

Thats kind of what I thought the 'session' entry for pam_unix implied.

| Matthew N. Dodd  | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD  |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |       2 x '84 Volvo 245DL        | ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter |  For Great Justice!  | ISO8802.5 4ever |

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to