Terry Lambert wrote:
> If we are expressing preferences, I prefer that it be called:

If we're expressing preferences, I think we should eliminate the wrapper

> Just so that the name matches it's *real* function, which is apparently
> to make sure that whatever variable you set to avoid getting perl last
> time is totally ineffective in preventing you getting perl this time.

But you're not getting perl, you're just getting the basically harmless
wrapper. I had two choices with this change, I could either change the
variable back to NOPERL which both A) Doesn't match the current
pseudo-standard, and B) doesn't describe what it's actually doing. 

> I personally just consider it an unsubtle means of perl advocacy...

I tend to agree with this.

   "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.
      And in this great conflict, ...  we will see freedom's victory."
        - George W. Bush, President of the United States
          State of the Union, January 28, 2002

         Do YOU Yahoo!?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to