turned out to be minor.. see other mail
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I'm not sure. I would be interested in seeing any warnings from building
> > new libc_r. The only places I can think of are the queues (with the
> > QMD debug defined, that would definitely cause problems), but that
> > seems to have been ruled out also when queue.h was reverted. Did
> > USRSTACK or SIGSTKSZ get changed somehow?
> > Someone can also try going into lib/libc_r/test and running the
> > tests in there, to see if even simple threaded programs are borken
> > or not.
> I'd try but...
> cc -Wall -pipe -g3 -D_LIBC_R_ -D_REENTRANT -c mutex_d.c -o mutex_d_a.o
> mutex_d.c:168: initializer element is not constant
> mutex_d.c: In function `waiter':
> mutex_d.c:358: warning: too few arguments for format
> *** Error code 1
> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libc_r/test.
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message