On Thursday, 4 July 2002 at 19:20:00 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >>> This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating >>> working code to write a second system. >> >> Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second >> system, and I don't think the resources have been diverted as much >> as defected. >> >> Either way, I know you don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think >> I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we >> should stay stuck back there. > > I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards.
I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who disagrees that devfs is a forward. It may need some improvement, but it's so much more logical than what we had before that I really think you should explain your objections. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message