On Thursday,  4 July 2002 at 19:20:00 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>>> This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating
>>> working code to write a second system.
>> Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second
>> system, and I don't think the resources have been diverted as much
>> as defected.
>> Either way, I know you don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think
>> I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we
>> should stay stuck back there.
> I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards.

I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I
think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who disagrees that devfs
is a forward.  It may need some improvement, but it's so much more
logical than what we had before that I really think you should explain
your objections.

See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to