On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 03:05:37PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:28:09PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > ru 2002/07/18 05:54:56 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > share/man/man5 make.conf.5 > > > share/examples/etc make.conf > > > Log: > > > To force install(1) to always compare files before installing, one > > > now needs to set COPY=-C as -C is no longer compatible with the -d > > > option. It is also likely to be renamed to INSTALL_COPY soon. > > > Update documentation to reflect this change. > > > > > > PR: bin/40724 > > > > The bug is that -C is no longer compatible with -d. See also misc/40414. > > > This PR is already closed. > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:21:14PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > ru 2002/07/18 05:07:49 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > etc Makefile > [...] > > > usr.sbin/ypserv Makefile > > > Log: > > > s/${INSTALL} -c/${INSTALL} ${COPY}/ > > > > Strongly unapproved by: bde. > > > > This change is to help work around the foot-shooting of making -d > > incompatible with -C and -p in install(1)'s flags. It abuses the old > > poorly named COPY variable which had become a no-op. Now COPY is still > > poorly named but has different semantics. All this is like breaking > > cc to reject combinations of flags that don't really go together (e.g., > > -I doesn't go with linking) instead of just ignoring the flags that > > don't apply to the current operation, and then working around this > > foot-shooting by splitting up CFLAGS and changing many Makefiles to > > only use the part of CFLAGS that is relevant. > > > Since its first revision (install.1,v 1.7 and install.c,v 1.16 they > were incompatible). Later on, in rev. 1.26, it was made a no-op, > just to support "INSTALL=install -C" in /etc/make.conf. > > OpenBSD merged these changes and since then they still have them > incompatible. > > There are two ways to proceed: > > 1. Rename COPY to INSTALL_COPY (that was my plan), optionally giving > it by default an empty value. This shouldn't harm third-party > makefiles as -c is now an effective no-op. But this would make > us even more compatible with OpenBSD that has: > > : INSTALL_COPY The old usage of this flag is obsolescent since install(1) > : now copies by default. However, it can also be used to > : specify that a file not be copied unless it is different > : (via the -p option). See install(1) for details. This > : is to be used when building our own install script so > : that the entire system can either be installed with copies, > : or copy-if-different using a single knob. [-c] > OTOH, if we go this way we can get rid of ugly ${COPY} completely.
> 2. Make again -C an allowed (ignored) option in the -d case. This would > make us again incompatible with OpenBSD. > > I do not have a technical problem doing either, I'd just like to know > what do others think about this. I'm not sure what's the better way, please help me out. :-) Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
msg41225/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature