Terry Lambert wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:25:37PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > The patch that Tim posted, which is GPL'ed because of its origin,
> > > and therefore unusable exacept as a model, "fixes" the problem
> > > by blocking the signal delivery before the fork.
> > Can you provide a non-GPL patch to assuage your repeated
> > beratement of Tim?
> I'm not repeatedly berating him. I'm simply pointing out
> that the proposed patch has a license incompatbile with
> the source code.
As to your question about the patch, I'm using code that
predates the PAM changes, and not running with the most
recent set of KSE changes to the signal handling, so I
don't have the problem.
The simplest solution is to undo the things that happened
between the time the problem started, and the time there
wasn't a problem. IMO, it's the responsibility of the
people who broke it to fix it, as the price for having the
changes they made stay in the source tree. Making changes
that break things you personally don't care about is not a
workable model (also IMO).
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message