Hello, David!
You wrote to "Sergey Mokryshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 21 Aug 2002
12:07:43 -0500:

 >> No, ipl.ko is not broken. It depends on pfil(9).

 DWC> Shouldn't we try to make a pfil.ko that ipl.ko depends on then?

I make a brief look into code (I am not a kernel hacker nor a

There are a few files with PFIL_HOOKS-dependant #ifdefs, but it is
tied with the code.


Darren Reed has some pieces of code on his site, but I
did not read it.

According to pfil(9) manual
     The current pfil implementation will need changes to suit a
threaded ker-
     nel model.

May be this is the reason not to make it default.

Sincerely yours,
Sergey Mokryshev.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to