> As the kqueue paper points out, /dev/imon is less efficient that
> the kqueue equivalent.

Of course. But it sucks adding kqueue support to all programs which already
use imon support.

I'll do this now for the fam port. Any other programs out there which use
/dev/imon directly ?

That means fam will soon support kqueue to monitor files and not use polling
mode anymore.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to