On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > : > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > : > : Is it statically linked?
> : > : >
> : > : > Yup.
> : > :
> : > : You'll need to rebuild against the new libc_r, then.
> : >
> : > Yuck. I'd rather nail jello to a tree than try to update a port that
> : > complicated.
> : If it makes you feel better, I just ran a compile on my -CURRENT
> : machine, and it went fine. Both mozilla and mozilla-devel should build
> : out of the tree....with or without jello.
> Do you know if this breaks libc_r.so.4.0 too? I'm thinking of just
> grabbing the build from Mozilla.org...
I think it does since it's a kernel ABI breakage in ucontext_t's
and sigreturn(). I think we either need to reformat the ucontext_t
in some way that is compatible with the old format, or make a
new sigreturn() using the current one for compatibility. It's
a shame 'cause it's only broken for i386, not the other archs.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message