> > 2.  Under assumed name, "libxmlread" or something.  This means that
> >     nothing which doesn't explicitly ask for it will get in touch with
> >     this version of libexpat, and that will only be the programs in
> >     the tree.  We don't need to track the official libexpat (sort of
> >     like the DB(3) situation, except with better isolation I guess).
> 
> This seems to be a nice idea.  Can you trim down "our" version of expat
> to only the libxmlread part or so?  This way we don't get too much
> bloat, the perl fiasco won't happen, and once we've got a working
> version we can update only for bug fixes.
IMO 1. would be better with a complete expat. So the ports could use the system 
version and probably/maybe the drift between the official- and system-version will not 
be that big. And compared to Perl expat it rather small. So the bloat couldn't be that 
big..

Marc

Attachment: msg43745/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to