On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:07:22 -0800 (PST), Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > Thanks, that's what I was expecting.  The attached patch provides the
> > following behavior:
> 
> > sleep 0 = exit 0 immediately
> > sleep [ \t]*1AAAA = sleep 1 second
> > sleep [ \t]*\.2zzz = sleep .2 seconds
> > sleep [ \t]*-.* = usage()
> 
> I believe that the language in the Standard was adopted so that an
> implementation can just use strtoul() and have the Standard Thing
> happen.

So "sleep -1" should sleep for ~0UL seconds?  And should usage() ever be
called then?

-Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to