On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:07:22 -0800 (PST), Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Thanks, that's what I was expecting. The attached patch provides the > > following behavior: > > > sleep 0 = exit 0 immediately > > sleep [ \t]*1AAAA = sleep 1 second > > sleep [ \t]*\.2zzz = sleep .2 seconds > > sleep [ \t]*-.* = usage() > > I believe that the language in the Standard was adopted so that an > implementation can just use strtoul() and have the Standard Thing > happen.
So "sleep -1" should sleep for ~0UL seconds? And should usage() ever be called then? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message