If memory serves me right, Robert Watson wrote: > Note that the rpc.lockd support is still experimental in 5.0 for > client-side locking, and as such, might not be good to enable by default. > I notice that in the original message for this thread, there's reference > to release documentation indicating that client side locking isn't > implemented: this is actually not the case. We do implement it now.
I freely declare my ignorance about NFS locking. :-) If someone can fix up this part of the release notes to match reality, I'd be grateful. Thanks, Bruce.
msg47446/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
