* De: "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-16 ] [ Subjecte: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review ] > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 19:11:49 +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > In the case where an application is OPIEised and not PAMised, we > > need to figure out something; PAMizing such apps is not terribly > > hard. If any of them are in the base system, then this situation > > We are not in the situation to force users and admins to rewrite their > OPIE apps under new PAM framework. I always believe that non-destructive > for OPIE defaults (i.e. PAM only) solution is possible here, but not > being PAM specialist, can't demonstrate it. Recent des commits solve > problem correctly.
Can you explain how this stops purely opieized apps from working? I was under the impression the implicit case was still there, we just have a more explicit contract with the OPIE system. -- Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - AIM: BSDFlata -- IRC: juli on EFnet OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer - ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD - Never trust an ELF, COFF or Mach-O! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message