On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Christopher Vance wrote: > On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 08:14:44PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > : On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 01:58:19AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > : > Myron J. Mayfield wrote: > : > >start it. It gives me an error saying cant find /dev/shm. I tried > : > >adding this to /dev but was unable to. Does anyone have any > : > > : > For some unexcused reason there is the trend in Linux to represent > : > everything as kind of a wired half finished pseudo file system. /proc pipe > : > devicefs sysctl and so on... The list is really long. Even shared memmory is > : > mapped to ehrm.... a filesystem. This is "expected" to be mounted at > : > /dev/shm by the system. You can't expect FreeBSD to follow this path... > : > : Linux isn't the only system that does this (learn a little, criticize less). > > If you're talking about Plan 9 or Inferno, they at least have a > history of finishing their filesystems and understanding why it's done > that way. If Linux attempts to copy without understanding, and > doesn't complete the job, it doesn't imply that the original idea was > a Bad Thing, only that the implementation sucks.
Better, apparently to "copy" (not actually), rather than to whine in the background... Still - your response is equally ignorant (Plan 9 is well known - even to students), since it offers no useful information. The /proc stuff is used in "real" Unix's such as Solaris. Just checking, I see that FreeBSD implements procfs, which is along the same lines. (still waiting for FreeBSD to "complete" a sysinstall program that doesn't look as if it was an assignment for high-school interns). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"