On 2003-07-10 12:03 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > David Leimbach wrote: > >I think C takes a more low-level approach and says "void * is just an > >address > >void * + 1 means the next valid address". > > This is not true. > > The ANSI C standard forbids arithmetic on void * pointers, > just as C++ does. > > GNU gcc has supported void * arithmetic for a long > time as an extension, but it's not standard behavior > and you should not rely on it.
Yes, please don't it'll just make things harder for TenDRA in the future :) <-goes back to his cave. Amar. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
