Peter Kadau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi ! > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning%20Options > > Hmm, that's exactly as in the info page. > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3/gcc/C---Dialect-Options.html#C++%20Dialect%20Options > > > and search for permissive, to see the condition Alexander speaks of. > > Well, here it is: > -fpermissive > Downgrade messages about nonconformant code from errors to > warnings. By default, G++ effectively sets -pedantic-errors > without -pedantic; this option reverses that. This behavior and > this option are superseded by -pedantic, which works as it does > for GNU C.
On second reading, I'm not sure I understand it either. (And I am a native speaker. :-) > > I admit, I'm not a native speaker, so please correct me. > Doesn't that mean, if you don't specify any pedantic, it defaults > to -pedantic-errors for C++, but if you specify -pedantic, you don't > get errors for warnings like it should be... ?? Specifying -pedantic doesn't turn errors into warnings for g++. I don't think the phrase 'this option reverses that' is intended to mean g++ swaps the meaning of -pendantic and -pendantic-errors; I think it is intended to mean -fpermissive downgrades many errors into warnings. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"