From: "Mike Makonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some
> > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a
> > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail.  Otherwise, you
> > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment.  I
suspect a
> > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a
> > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the
> > >right devfs contents.
> >
> > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes
> > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without
> > prove it first)
> Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
> patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll
> dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the
> two.
I thought I had submitted my final patch, the only thing left was what
number to use for the default jail devfs rule.

We also need a way to load user defined devfs rules.

I'll need to re-cvs diff my current devfs and jail scripts, before I'll be
able to send them again.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to