From: "Mike Makonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk > > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a > > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary > > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the > > >right devfs contents. > > > > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes > > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without > > prove it first) > > Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final > patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll > dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the > two. > I thought I had submitted my final patch, the only thing left was what number to use for the default jail devfs rule.
We also need a way to load user defined devfs rules. I'll need to re-cvs diff my current devfs and jail scripts, before I'll be able to send them again. Scot _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"