Not to undermine what you guys said, but this is unrelated to the
original post I think.  The problem I was having related to acpi, which
Shizuka pointed out.  I'm not trying to play nanny here, just don't want
people to get confused =)

On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:16, Daniel Flickinger wrote:

>   Sent: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:32:28 -0700 (PDT) by Doug White
> 
>   + On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Daniel Flickinger wrote:
>   +
>   + >     I had the same problem starting about a year ago when I
>   + >     finally gave up and upgraded to X4. The problem appears
>   + >     to be that the X4 driver does not disable the console
>   + >     mouse and the two of them fight over the interrupts.
>   +
>   + Well yeah moused and X can't both use the mouse at once. You
>   + should get a 'device busy' error.  If you want to use moused
>   + then have X gets its events from moused (/dev/sysmouse) and
>   + not psm0.
> 
>     That's what I did, as I had done in the past with X3
>     --upgrading to X4 is when the problem came up, and yes,
>     you get a mouse busy when you move it to /dev/psm0.
>     However, if you do not start the mouse for the virtual
>     screens (which I had no need for anyway), /dev/psm0 can
>     be opened for X4.
> 
>     Secondly, at the time, Xconfig would not accept
>     /dev/sysmouse as a ps2 style mouse and would not track
>     if I called it a generic mouse... that may have changed.
> 
>     CAVEAT: I admit that I have not revisted the problem
>     since then which was at least a year ago --it works, I
>     leave it alone despite several X4 upgrades. The remedy
>     at the time was to use /dev/psm0, not /dev/sysmouse.
>     Maybe in the next upgrade I'll revisit the aggravation
>     since I would prefer to be able to use virtual X
>     sessions on separate logins.
> 
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to